Subject: AIDS Treatment News #130 Date: Jul 12 1991 (829 lines) &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&& J O H N J A M E S writes on A I D S &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&& Copyright 1991 by John S. James; permission granted for non-commercial use. AIDS TREATMENT NEWS Issue #130, July 12, 1991 phone 800/TREEAT-1-2, or 415/255-0588 CONTENTS: [items are separated by "*****" for this display] Seventh International Conference on AIDS: Vaccine Development Neuropathy Update New Trial Recruiting at NIH: CD4-PE40 Newsletters for Women, Children with HIV Prison and AIDS Update Announcements: Date correction; Atlanta buyers' club; SEARCH Alliance; Night hotline; AIDS scams; Travel ban letters due ***** Seventh International Conference on AIDS: Vaccine Development by Michelle Roland Much of the Seventh International Conference on AIDS (June 16-21 in Florence, Italy) was devoted to presentations about vaccine development in laboratory studies, animal models, and human trials. Although vaccines have traditionally been used to prevent uninfected individuals from acquiring a new infection, much of the HIV-related vaccine research is expected to be of use to people who are already HIV-positive. In this article we will provide a brief overview of the status of vaccine trials, in addition to relevant news from the Florence conference. We will focus mainly on the results of studies in HIV-infected individuals. General Overview There are currently 13 vaccines in various stages of human testing around the world, including six which are being used in HIV-positive volunteers in an attempt to produce an effective immune response against the virus. Several different approaches are being tried. The overall goal is to use a substance which resembles all or part of HIV and which the human immune system will see as foreign and thus attack. The products generated by this immune response, including antibodies and special types of activated white blood cells, would hopefully also be effective against HIV in the bloodstream, and HIV-infected cells, in people who are already HIV-positive. In order for a vaccine to be useful in this population, the immune response to the vaccine will have to be more effective than that which occurs in the great majority of people after HIV infection. The substances used in the various vaccines are produced by one of the following methods. The whole virus can be killed or inactivated; the Salk HIV vaccine uses this whole killed virus approach. Alternatively, small portions of the virus, including parts of its outer coat (envelope), or portions of its inner (core) proteins, can be produced by genetic engineering technology. These are called the subunit vaccines. Another approach, using synthetic peptides, is also being tested; these are similar to subunit vaccines, but are smaller and produced using different techniques. (A peptide is simply a small part of a protein.) Finally, some researchers are inserting the gene for one or more of these proteins into different microbes (viruses, yeast, bacteria, etc.) which then produce the protein. When these microbes, known as vectors, are injected into people, they make the HIV proteins which they were genetically engineered to produce. This approach is known as the recombinant vector vaccine. Combinations of these, and other methods of vaccine production, are currently being tested. In the United States at least five vaccine candidates are in trials separately or in combination with one another. (1) MicroGeneSys is studying a gp160 subunit vaccine called VaxSyn (gp160 is a protein which is found in the outer envelope of HIV). (2) MicroGeneSys has also produced a p24 subunit vaccine (p24 is one of the inner core proteins of HIV). (3) Bristol-Meyers Squibb has a recombinant gp160 vaccine. By inserting the gene for gp160 into the vaccinia virus, the modified virus makes gp160 in the human body. (The vaccinia virus is the same one used for many years for smallpox vaccines.) (4) Viral Technologies is testing HGP-30, a synthetic peptide fragment of p17, one of the core proteins of HIV. (5) The killed-virus vaccine developed by Jonas Salk, M. D., is also in U. S. human trials; however, no new information about it was presented at the Florence conference. The AIDS Vaccine Evaluation Units (AVEUs), a group of five universities, are the Federal Government's primary testing sites for vaccines. The AVEUs are located at Johns Hopkins University, St. Louis University, University of Rochester, University of Washington in Seattle, and Vanderbilt University. They have only tested vaccines in HIV-negative volunteers so far, looking for safety data and for the degree of immune response. Two vaccines are also being studied at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) in Bethesda, Maryland; neither of these trials is now recruiting new volunteers. For information on vaccine trials in the U. S., call 800/TRIALS-A. Outside the U. S., the drug companies Chiron and Ciba-Geigy are jointly developing a gp120 vaccine (gp120 is another envelope protein). A French scientist, Daniel Zagury, M. D., from the University of Paris, is using a novel combination approach which includes some of the products discussed above, in addition to inactivated white blood cells and inactivated products of these cells, in an attempt to restore immune function in people with HIV infection. Florence Conference News The overall sentiment of researchers at the Florence conference can be summarized in the following statement by Anthony Fauci, M. D., the U. S. government's highest official AIDS researcher, from the opening session of the conference: "...Vaccine development creates an imposing challenge to the biomedical research community... Hopefully, and I am optimistic in this regard, we will witness the availability of a safe and effective vaccine against HIV in the decade of the 1990s." According to Daniel Bolognesi, M. D., one of the leaders in HIV vaccine research from Duke University, several vaccines should be ready to enter large-scale human trials for testing of effectiveness in the next three years. Currently, several small clinical trials are ongoing. We will describe the preliminary results of most of these studies as they were presented at the conference. Subunit Vaccine: VaxSyn The recently published report from the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, using VaxSyn in thirty HIV-positive volunteers with greater than 400 T-helper cells, received widespread media attention in the United States during the week of the Florence conference (Redfield RR, Birx DL, Ketter N, and others. A phase I evaluation of the safety and immunogenicity of vaccination with recombinant gp160 in patients with early human immunodeficiency virus infection. New England Journal of Medicine, June 13, 1991; volume 324, number 24, pages 1677-1684.) This study found that the vaccine was safe and caused an immune response in 19 of the 30 volunteers. Those who were able to mount an immune response tended to have higher T-helper cell counts when they entered the study; they were also more often in the group which received six injections rather than three. T- helper cell counts remained stable in the 19 vaccine responders over a ten-month period, but dropped approximately seven percent in the group which did not respond, suggesting that the immune response to the vaccine may have had some protective effect. Another small study of VaxSyn, looking at two doses in 20 patients in Montreal, was presented at the conference (abstract # M. A. 1329). Eight of the nine patients who had been followed for over 180 days were reported to have developed an increased antibody response. In addition, T-helper cell counts stabilized above their baseline values, and HIV could not be cultured from the blood. VaxSyn is also being studied in HIV-negative volunteers and at several other sites in people with HIV infection. In addition to studies of this compound by itself, it has been combined with several other vaccine approaches. Combination of Two Subunit Vaccines: VaxSyn Plus p24 Gary Blick, M. D., from Greenwich, Connecticut, reported on the first of two community-based trials of gp160 (the VaxSyn product) in combination with a recombinant p24 vaccine (abstract # M. A. 1343). In the first study, data from 25 patients, including 16 without symptoms and nine with AIDS or symptomatic HIV infection, were presented. The vaccines appeared to be safe and well tolerated. p24 antibodies were increased; analysis of the response to gp160 has not yet been completed. After five months the majority of patients with initial T-helper cell counts above 200 demonstrated small but statistically significant increases in their T-helper cell counts and other T-cell measures. There were no significant increases in the group with T-helper counts less than 200 at study entry. Five of 30 original patients withdrew from the study because of development of new opportunistic infections. Dr. Blick began a second study in May of this year in which all volunteers receive gp160, but half are randomized to receive the p24 vaccine in addition, with the other half receiving a placebo. This study is designed to learn if adding the p24 increases the effectiveness. In addition, this vaccine will be given by a different route than that used in most other HIV vaccine trials -- by intradermal instead of intramuscular injections. It is possible that the vaccine will produce a greater immune response when deposited directly under the skin, where large numbers of immune cells are located. All three of the studies using VaxSyn suggest that this vaccine, either alone or in combination with a p24 vaccine, does cause an immune response. There is also preliminary data suggesting that there may be some clinical benefit for individuals with relatively high T-helper counts. None, however, have proven to be effective in helping people with HIV infection stay healthier longer. It is impossible to know whether the immune response elicited by the vaccine will be more helpful than that which the body creates on its own in response to HIV infection. It is clear, however, that the immune response elicited to VaxSyn is different from that elicited by HIV infection (see abstract # M. A. 1344). Larger, controlled trials will be required to determine if this vaccine will be helpful clinically. It will also be important to learn how to use it in combination with other vaccines, in combination with antiviral and/or immune-enhancing drugs, or when administered by different routes, in different dosages, with different frequencies, etc. None of the studies so far can answer these questions; they do, however, show the importance of further research in this area. Live Virus Vector Priming Followed by Subunit Boost: HIVAC- 1e, Then VaxSyn Two studies, one in macaque monkeys and one in HIV-negative people, demonstrated that a technique of using two different types of vaccine elicited a larger, potentially more effective, immune response than did either approach alone. Barney S. Graham, M. D., Ph.D., from Vanderbilt University's AVEU, reported on a small study using Oncogen/Bristol-Myers Squibb's recombinant gp160 vaccinia virus vector (called HIVAC-1e) as a priming immunization, followed several months later by a booster immunization with VaxSyn (oral presentation # F. A. 1). According to the study authors, this combination produced a larger, longer-lasting immune response than either had produced alone. In addition, a greater proportion of those immunized with both vaccines produced so-called neutralizing antibodies, which are expected to be effective against HIV. Shiu-Lok Hu, M. D., of the University of Washington reported on a study in macaque monkeys using this same approach (abstract Th.A. 12). These monkeys were protected against infection with SIV (simian immunodeficiency virus, which is similar to HIV and infects some kinds of monkeys). Dr. Hu only used one strain of SIV, the same one from which the vaccines were developed; it is not known if this approach would protect the monkeys from infection with another SIV strain. Dr. Bolognesi noted that the human trials reported by Dr. Graham, and being conducted at the University of Washington in Seattle by Larry Corey, M. D., are showing impressive immune responses in HIV-negative volunteers (keynote speech, June 21 plenary session). However, he warned that the vaccinia virus vector may not be safe for use in HIV-positive individuals. Developing alternative vectors is therefore crucial for the application of this approach to those who are already HIV- infected. He described ongoing research into several alternative vectors, and stated that a combination of vectors and a combination of subunits will probably be even more effective. Combination Vaccine Approach from France A French researcher, Daniel Zagury, M. D., discussed his results from an uncontrolled trial of six individuals with HIV infection (abstract # M. A. 67). Dr. Zagury's strategy combines a number of different elements into what he calls an anti- cytostatic immunization regimen. Although he claims that the patients in his trial have all experienced either stabilization or increases in T-helper cell counts and weight, in addition to other clinical and laboratory signs which suggest improved immune function, criticisms of his program voiced at the conference were significant. Researchers were concerned that Dr. Zagury tested a combination of compounds without testing each one individually, making it impossible to determine which one or ones were effective. In addition, he was criticized for not using a control group to see if there was a difference between those patients treated and those who remained untreated. Although valid concerns were raised, it was impossible to tell how much of the criticism arose from historical hostility which many of those present at the conference seem to feel towards Dr. Zagury. In any case, Dr. Zagury's combination of HIV peptides, HIV pseudovirions, inactivated alpha-interferon and inactivated suppressor T-cells, a combination which he devised based on a new theory of immune function and dysfunction in HIV infection, is intriguing. The results he claims suggest that this approach deserves serious consideration. Conclusion In addition to the human studies discussed above, many reports of progress in the design of new and improved vaccine approaches, and early animal studies in various models of HIV infection, show hopeful signs in the development of safe and effective vaccines. These studies could lead to development of a significant additional tool for the treatment of HIV. For this goal to be achieved, significant funding, along with international scientific and political cooperation, will be crucial. ***** Neuropathy Update by Denny Smith Issue #121 of AIDS TREATMENT NEWS contained a short overview of possible treatments for HIV-related peripheral neuropathy, with a call for our readers to share their experience with us. Two people did so, and we relay that information below, as well as some brief news regarding neuropathy presented at the Seventh International Conference on AIDS in Florence. A number of studies of peripheral neuropathy were discussed at Florence, but most of them dealt with laboratory descriptions of cell pathology more than treatment for neuropathy. An Italian study from the University of Pavia described the development of neuropathy in patients after treatment with AZT (abstract # M. B. 2115). AZT is already associated with muscle tissue damage, or myopathy, after prolonged use in some people. Preliminary results of the California mexiletine study that we mentioned in our last neuropathy report were included in the Conference abstracts. The authors state that mexiletine has been well-tolerated in the study participants, but proof of efficacy is not yet established (abstract # M. B. 2068). After our last report on neuropathy, one friend of the newsletter called to say that had he obtained substantial relief with chiropractic treatments. His neuropathy was apparently caused not by HIV but by a three-week regimen of intravenous pentamidine. Following the pentamidine he experienced a severe, chronic pain in one arm which was diagnosed by his primary physician as neuropathy. Our friend sought the attention of an HIV-knowledgeable chiropractor, who initiated weekly treatments. Within ten treatments he noticed nearly complete relief from the neuropathy. (Drug-induced neuropathy can often resolve itself if the problem drug is discontinued or reduced in dosage soon enough.) Jeanne Day of the Community Research Initiative of New England told us that they are conducting a study of acupuncture to treat HIV-associated neuropathy. This study, funded by the American Foundation for AIDS Research (AmFAR), began recruiting last November and is still open to new participants. Ms. Day said that although it is too early to report the results of formal neurological assessments, the acupuncturists administering the treatments are optimistic with their patients' progress so far. People interested in the study can call 617/424-1524. Incidentally, a very good general discussion of acupuncture therapy in HIV infection appeared in the May 15, 1991, edition of Treatment Issues, published by the Gay Men's Health Crisis in New York. Fortunately, many of the drugs now tried experimentally to relieve neuropathy, including nortriptyline, imipramine, mexiletine, and topical preparations of capsaicin, are already approved for other indications and so are available for the cost of a prescription. But looking for conceptually new options in established forums like the International AIDS Conferences can be unrewarding. Sustainable, low-cost treatment possibilities like acupuncture represent an innovative direction in AIDS research, but will probably require community interest and community-based organizations to do the research which is necessary. ***** New Trial Recruiting at NIH: CD4-PE40 by Michelle Roland The first study of a new compound, called CD4-PE40, is currently seeking volunteers with T-helper counts of 500 or less. They must be willing to abstain from all other experimental therapies for four weeks prior to the trial and during the course of the four-week study; they may, however, take AZT if they wish. This is a dose escalation study looking primarily at how the new drug behaves in the body (pharmacokinetics) and at safety/toxicity. It requires at least three days of hospitalization and three subsequent outpatient visits at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) in Bethesda, Maryland, near Washington, D. C. This is not a long-term treatment trial; there are not expected to be any medical benefits for study participants. For more information, call Chris Boenning, R. N., M. S. N., at 800/772-5464, ext. 410, or Betsy Herpin, R. N., M. S. N., at ext. 304. Note: Earlier clinical trials of soluble CD4 (and of CD4- IgG, the CD4 molecule with an IgG antibody attached to it to keep the compound in the bloodstream longer) have been disappointing, demonstrating no substantial signs of effectiveness in spite of dramatic anti-HIV results in test-tube studies. While most of the human trials of these compounds in adults are being abandoned, researchers at The Upjohn Company and the National Institutes of Health hope that by attaching pseudomonas exotoxin (PE40, a truncated form of a poison produced by the bacteria pseudomonas) to the CD4 molecule, they may achieve significant antiviral activity in people, as well as in laboratory studies. Richard Davey, M. D., the principal investigator for this study, explained that part of the problem with previous CD4 molecules may have been that not enough of the drug was able to bind to HIV in the bloodstream to prevent the virus from infecting cells. It is hoped that the new compound will only need to bind to a few receptors on an HIV-infected cell in order to kill that cell. Dr. Davey believes that if this compound is helpful, it will probably need to be used in combination with antiretrovirals such as AZT, ddC, ddI, or one of the newer agents now being developed. The reason is that when HIV-infected cells are killed, virus may be released into the bloodstream, and antiviral drugs may then be needed to prevent the freed virus from replicating further. The idea of combining CD4 with pseudomonas exotoxin is not new; a report that the combined protein selectively killed HIV- infected cells was published in Nature, September 22, 1988. The trial announced above is the first human test of this potential drug. ***** Newsletters for Women, Children with HIV by Michelle Roland * The Positive Woman is a national newsletter by and for HIV-positive women and their families and friends. It includes news on standard medical treatments, "alternative" treatments, referral information, and letters from subscribers. Recent issues have included articles on legal matters, sexuality, spirituality, vaccine and drug trials, and a listing of Washington, D. C. area clinics which provide care to persons who are homeless. The Positive Woman is published every other month. Yearly subscriptions are $12 for individuals, $40 for non-profit organizations, and $75 for businesses. For more information call 202/898-0732, or write to The Positive Woman, P. O. Box 34372, Washington, DC 20043. * WORLD (Women Organized to Respond to Life-Threatening Diseases), a new monthly newsletter in English and in Spanish, is published for women with HIV in Northern California. The first issue includes an article on gynecological manifestations of HIV, listings of support groups, a calendar of events, information on research studies and political groups, and a personal testimonial. The second issue expanded coverage of events from the San Francisco area to Northern California; coverage will expand beyond Northern California when women in other areas express interest. Future plans include a series of informal surveys to assess the needs, thoughts, and desires of women living with AIDS. WORLD is free, but donations are appreciated. To be included on the mailing list, or for more information, write: WORLD, P. O. Box 11535, Oakland, CA 94611, or phone 415/658-6930. Specify whether you want the English or the Spanish edition. * Children with AIDS, published every two months, covers medical issues, legal issues, social services, and the needs of drug-exposed and of HIV-positive children and their families. Articles are targeted to professionals working with children, family members, policy makers, and the public. Recent issues have included articles on civil rights for children with AIDS or HIV, and reports from the Sixth National Pediatric AIDS Conference and from the First National Conference on AIDS and Homeless Youth. Annual subscriptions are $25. For more information, write: Children with AIDS, 1800 Columbus Avenue, Roxbury, MA 02119, or phone 617/442-7442. Article submissions also welcome. ***** Prison and AIDS Update by Denny Smith Issue #126 of AIDS TREATMENT NEWS included an interview with three physicians who work at a California correctional facility in Vacaville -- Drs. Jessica Clarke, German Maisonet and Jan Diamond. Since then, a number of related developments have come to our attention. Reports of Poor Treatment The HIV medical care at Vacaville is provided by compassionate and expert physicians. The care for inmates at many other prisons, however, and during transfers between prisons, is inadequate or neglectful. We have been told, by trusted sources, of very ill persons who were housed in a simple infirmary for two months or more before transfer to a medical facility equipped to treat AIDS. By the time they were finally moved, some were sick with infections that long had gone untreated at the previous facility. For example, one man known to have less than 100 helper cells had been experiencing severe headaches for three months without receiving a diagnosis. By the time he was transferred to an appropriate physician, he was found to have very advanced cryptococcal meningitis, renal failure, and hearing loss, conditions which might have been controlled with timely treatment. Another man was transferred with advanced disseminated tuberculosis, and he died three days after the transfer. Diagnosed early, TB is a completely treatable disease. We were told that a common problem is undiagnosed changes in mental status. HIV-related processes can result in erratic behavior in some people. But in prison, a change in someone's behavior frequently will be labeled a disciplinary problem, so that people who require medical intervention for neurologic infections, or HIV-related dementia, may easily find themselves in "lockdown" instead. Interview With James Camarillo After reading the Vacaville interview, James Camarillo, who is now incarcerated there and has actively challenged some of the regressive policies of the California Department of Corrections, contacted us to share his experiences. DS: James, is Vacaville the only prison that you're familiar with? JC: No, before this I was at Chino East. That's where I found out I was HIV+. I got no counselling, just notification that I'd be transferred. DS: How was the care there? JC: It was poor, even before they knew I had HIV. DS: How do you feel about the care you've gotten since you were transferred to Vacaville? JC: It's better; they have three doctors who know what they're doing. DS: I understand that you have been involved in a class- action suit. What was the basis of the suit? JC: To get the same education and job opportunities that guys on the mainline have. Segregation is an obstacle to those opportunities. DS: What about the concern voiced by the correctional system that inmates known to be positive might be targets of violence? JC: That's changed. Some of us have been educating inmates on the mainline. We're accepted now. A lot of them know that they could have HIV, too, but they don't want to be tested because they don't want to be segregated. DS: So they could actually be missing out on treatment they may need, for fear of segregation. JC: That's right. DS: The rules against condoms -- does anyone have access to them? JC: Only for conjugal visits, and afterwards you have to return the condoms, used or not. Anyone caught with a condom outside of a conjugal visit gets a disciplinary writeup. And inmates known to have HIV aren't even allowed conjugal visits. DS: That's outrageous. Regarding treatment information, would inmates make use of printed material if it was available to them? JC: Yes, they would; in fact, Dr. Diamond here tried to provide some reading materials for us in segregation, but the guys on the mainline need it, too. DS: It sounds like what you want is what the doctors there would like as well -- an end to segregation, conjugal rights for inmates with HIV, unpressured testing and treatment information for those on the mainline, and condoms for everyone. What would you say to people in prisons elsewhere, especially in other states, where conditions are sometimes much worse? JC: Legal action. I used to sit in the little yard set aside for us with HIV, reading books that a prison library clerk would bring me. One day I asked him, "How can I ever get out of here [segregation]?" He said "File a lawsuit." I didn't know where to start, so he gave me a book, and that's how I got going. It's the only thing they will listen to. Interview with Mary Lucey During a recent state activist conference in May, we met Mary Lucey, who began working with ACT UP/LA after her release from the women's prison in Southern California. Following are highlights of a conversation we had. DS: Mary, you were held at the California Institute for Women? ML: Yes, at Frontera. There are other facilities for women, but Frontera is where any woman known to have HIV is sent. During the transfer to Frontera, they told me I had to wear a mask. But the weather was really hot, and I refused to put the mask on. They punished me by turning off the air conditioning. When we arrived at Frontera they immediately took my AZT away from me. They said I had to be evaluated by a doctor first, and be tested for HIV antibodies, have my blood counts done, and then I could have AZT. Well, we're talking about a six-month delay. DS: Are inmates with HIV segregated at Frontera? ML: Yes, and in fact, the fear of being segregated discourages women on the mainline or at other facilities from being open about their serostatus, or getting tested to find out. DS: Just like at the men's prisons. It makes early treatment an impossibility for those people. ML: And segregation also means no private visits with their kids or spouses, no conjugal visits. DS: What's the care like in the segregated section of Frontera? Is bloodwork monitored on any regular basis? ML: Well, the unit is called Walker A, and it has 40 beds. It's surrounded by a white mesh fence that you can't see through. The unit itself houses anyone with HIV, regardless of their health requirements, regardless of their conviction or sentencing status. Bloodwork is drawn maybe every six months. Frontera is the largest women's prison in the United States, but there is no infectious disease specialist on staff; in fact, the chief medical officer of the prison is a psychiatrist with no HIV expertise. DS: That tells you something about their attitude toward women who are sick -- all they need is a psychiatrist. ML: Right. It's all in our heads! They do have a counselor for the unit, and she's called "the grim reaper" because of her "you're going to die" negativity. She once asked me "So what is the average T-cell count for a healthy person?" I had to be her teacher. The M.D.s aren't HIV-educated, either. A major problem if you become sick in there is just getting them to know that you're sick. Then, if they're nice enough, they'll try to help. If not, if they think you're faking it, well, you could die. DS: What about the charges that lack of medical attention has contributed to unnecessary illnesses and deaths? ML: One time when I was on the mainline, I came down with hepatitis. I was bright yellow, and I'd lost 20 pounds -- I obviously had hepatitis. They gave me an appointment six weeks away. But I marched into the clinic and just said, "Look, I'm seeing a doctor today." So they put me in isolation in the prison hospital, but didn't treat me. Doctors don't make rounds there -- they come by and count you three times a day. I became really dehydrated and scared. Finally I caught a sergeant's attention by beating on the door. When she saw the shape I was in, she ordered juices and medication for the diarrhea and nausea. Another woman, a transsexual, was dead for three days in her cell before they noticed her food trays stacking up. Sometimes medical officers have been caught falsifying death records. One woman who is still quite alive was reported as deceased several months after she appeared at a hearing to testify against the prison. But a lot of women in institutions don't know how to fight for themselves. DS: If they could, a lot of them probably wouldn't be there. Everything you're talking about sounds like lawsuit material. Is there any legal action taking place now? ML: There are some class-action suits going on, but they're not resolved yet. We've testified in Sacramento, and were essentially ignored. John Burton [California state assemblyman] was great at the hearings, though. He jabbed the Department of Correction's policy on limiting visits for HIV+ inmates by asking if the Department was worried that incarcerated women might infect their kids by having sex with them during visits. They said "No, of course not". Then he asked if they were afraid they might give their kids drugs. "Oh, no, no. " Finally he said,"OK, I got it. They're performing minor surgery." DS: The joke was on them, but I bet they didn't even know it. ML: Well, these women know it. There are some real fighters in there trying to make waves. I know one woman who has been fighting tooth and nail, even with CMV and encephalitis. Now she's ready for a hospice, but there's no hospice to go to. These women call me on the phone and they're crying, they're scared to death. Sometimes I lay awake at night trying to come up with some way to move the sons of bitches who control the correctional system. People who want to support us should write to James Gomez, the Director of Corrections [1515 S Street, Sacramento, CA, 95814]. Tell him we need a real infectious disease specialist for those women. And they have to improve the nutrition of their meals. And we want an end to HIV segregation. Treatment Libraries Proposal Joe Guimento, Research Coordinator for the AIDS/HIV Treatment Directory published by the American Foundation For AIDS Research (AmFAR), called us after the Vacaville interview to say that AmFAR also receives a substantial amount of correspondence from prisoners who need current treatment information. Joe proposed to us and to Judy Greenspan of the National Prison Project of the American Civil Liberties Union the idea of HIV "minilibraries" in every correctional institution -- collections of printed material which could relieve individual inmates from having to search for information by mail, and vastly improve the access prisoners in general have to treatment developments. The libraries could grow in scope as possible, but would begin with subscriptions to some basic community news sources -- BETA, Notes From the Underground, PI Perspectives, and Treatment Issues -- as well as AmFAR's AIDS/HIV Treatment Directory and AIDS TREATMENT NEWS. Prisoners or correctional workers who are interested in establishing such a library should write to Joe Guimento at AmFAR, 1515 Broadway, Suite 3601, New York, NY, 10036. ***** Announcements ** Correction: Date of Last Issue Our last issue was incorrectly dated July 26. The date should have been June 28. AIDS TREATMENT NEWS is usually published on the first and third Friday of each month. The June 28 and both July issues have been delayed a week due to travel to conferences. Our next issue will be dated July 27 (a Saturday), to avoid the confusion of July 26 appearing as the date on two issues. ** Atlanta: New Buyers' Club People living in the Atlanta area will have increased access to some promising HIV and AIDS-related treatments through a new buyers' club opening there. The Atlanta Buyers Club (ABC), is a non-profit community organization pledged to offer its members a forum for information and a source for alternative treatments. Like other buyers' clubs around the country serving people with HIV, ABC cannot make professional medical recommendations. ABC members will be encouraged to discuss all treatment decisions with their doctors, and the organizers of the club told us that they are seeking productive communication with HIV health providers in Atlanta. To contact ABC, interested persons may call 404/874-4845, or write to P. O. Box 77003, Atlanta, GA, 30357. ** SEARCH Alliance Seeks Executive Director SEARCH Alliance, a community-based AIDS treatment research organization in Los Angeles (see AIDS TREATMENT NEWS #105, June 15, 1990) is looking for an executive director. The candidate must have proven fundraising ability and strong administrative experience. Send resume to: William Zimmerman, Suite 901, 14724 Ventura Blvd., Sherman Oaks, CA 91403. ** San Francisco: HIV "Nightline" Sponsored by Suicide Prevention Project Two years ago, San Francisco Suicide Prevention established a hotline to offer nighttime support and information to people with emotional concerns about HIV. The "AIDS/HIV Nightline," the only service of its kind in the U. S., receives calls from around the country, and is staffed by volunteers who are trained to speak compassionately and knowledgeably about a range of issues related to HIV infection and crisis intervention. The line is open 9 p.m. to 5 a.m. on Mondays through Fridays, and 5 p.m. to 5 a.m. Saturdays and Sundays. The number to call from San Francisco and outside of Northern California is 415/668-AIDS, and throughout Northern California, 800/273-AIDS. Volunteers and donations for the Nightline are welcomed. ** AIDS Frauds and Scams: Journalist Seeks Interviews The Center for Investigative Reporting (CIR) in San Francisco has been asked to provide an article on AIDS fraud for a publication which goes mainly to physicians' offices. We spoke with Sarah Henry of CIR, who is doing this story, and found that unlike many reporters who approach it, she is well aware of the difference between legitimate experimentation and unconscionable exploitation; she wants to focus her article on the latter. Anyone who has had personal experience with a suspected treatment scam and wants to talk with a journalist about it can contact Sarah Henry at CIR: phone 415/543-1200, or fax 415/543-8311, or mail to CIR, 530 Howard Street, 2nd Floor, San Francisco, CA 94105. She needs to hear from people as soon as possible. ** Travel/Immigration Reminder: Letters Must Be Received by August 2 By the time you receive the next issue of AIDS TREATMENT NEWS, it will be too late to write your letter or postcard supporting the end of the ban on visitors and immigrants with HIV entering the United States. Public comments must be received in Atlanta, Georgia by August 2 in order to be considered. Your letter could urge that the final rule proposed by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), and published in the Federal Register on January 23, be adopted. This proposal, that only persons with active tuberculosis be automatically excluded from the United States on public-health grounds, is the recommendation of experts within HHS and is supported by all medical authorities. (Political pressure from conservatives, and from the U. S. Department of Justice, prevented this rule from being implemented as scheduled on June 1.) Write to: Director, Division of Quarantine, Center for Prevention Services, Centers for Disease Control, Mail Stop E04, Atlanta, GA 30333. For extensive background on this issue, which threatens the Eighth International Conference on AIDS scheduled for Boston in May, 1992, see AIDS TREATMENT NEWS #128. If you need a copy, send us a self-addressed stamped envelope and a note requesting issue #128. Note: Perhaps the best short statement of the case against the travel and immigration ban is the lead editorial in The New York Times, Wednesday, June 19, 1991. [Obsolete subscription information has been removed. See the latest issues for up-to-date information. -- sysop] &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&& End of display