Subject: (Editorial): Washington Prevails Date: Published: 8/5/92 (71 lines) Source: Wall Street Journal. Copyright Dow Jones & Co. Inc. REVIEW & OUTLOOK (Editorial): Washington Prevails In the editorial above, we relate the extraordinary story of the French health bureaucracy's apparent decision to allow hemophiliacs there to receive blood that hadn't been tested for the HIV virus {see related editorial: "REVIEW & OUTLOOK (Editorial): Murder by Bureaucracy" -- WSJ Aug. 5, 1992}. On Monday, the U. S. Department of Health and Human Services ruled that Oregon's rationed health-care system couldn't go forward because it violates the Americans With Disabilities Act. Within these two stories we have two faces of the modern state bureaucracy -- one brutal, the other benevolent. In both cases, the government appears incapable of performing well. The inadequacies of modern state bureaucracies seem to have become a pervasive problem. Our own sense is that national governments, or at least the kind of people who seem to be drawn toward them, seem to have been overwhelmed by public hubris. They think there is nothing that the exercise of their great power cannot achieve. So now we have the architects of the Americans With Disabilities Act deciding that Oregon's plan, the product of an arduous political consensus within that state, simply doesn't fit the grand design of their legislated benevolence. The Americans With Disabilities Act is beginning to have the look of Big Brother. The Oregon system exists because that state, like most states, can't afford to pay for the degree of Medicaid coverage Washington has mandated. To extend coverage to the poorest, it decided to subject 709 medical treatments and conditions to a cost-benefit analysis. On Monday the Bush administration said the plan is "tainted by discrimination" against the disabled. An example? The Oregon plan doesn't cover liver transplants for alcoholics who've destroyed their livers, and alcoholics are now a protected class under the Americans With Disabilities Act. Similarly, Oregon wouldn't provide coverage for terminally ill AIDS patients in the last six months of life. The disabilities act covers AIDS. The men and women of Washington, playing at benevolence, have broken free of everyday reality. The same day the Bush administration ruled, the National Governors' Association issued a statement that Medicaid has become "so complex that it is incomprehensible to recipients and providers and unmanageable for governors." But the Remocrats and Depublicans plow mindlessly forward, pursuing some theoretically perfect fairness. They have sent the American health care system reeling toward absurdity. No nation, not even the U. S., has the wealth to provide all with equal degrees of state-of-the-art medical treatment. But the disabilities act now apparently requires that. And we don't doubt that a Clinton-Gore administration would attempt to add more. Because no reform in health delivery services can meet this unattainable standard, efforts at reform will slow or stop. Medical innovation is initially expensive, so the incentive to pursue such innovations weakens. We don't know that Oregon's rationing system is the full answer to the health-cost problem. But this experiment and alternatives in other states won't get the chance to prove themselves. Washington has arrogated this matter to itself; any political consensus achieved by people in a state can be waved away. Again, the men and women of official Washington are convinced that they are merely doing great and needed good. All that is needed to achieve the good is for the American people to conform. The anger and frustration evident among the electorate suggests to us that U. S. voters would like to have a heart-to-heart talk with their leadership about this and many of the other conformities that Washington has imposed upon them. The absurdities, and their costs, have become too much. [This article is made available here by Dow Jones Co. for the personal and non-commercial use of callers to this bbs, in the hope that it will be of some help to those who are suffering from the disease and others who are seeking to help them.]