Subject: Letters to the Editor: The Strange Case of Dr. Kessler Date: Published: 5/19/92 (97 lines) Source: Wall Street Journal. Copyright Dow Jones & Co. Inc. Letters to the Editor: The Strange Case of Dr. Kessler David Kessler's tenure as FDA commissioner began with high hopes. He promised faster drug approval, responsiveness to people with life-threatening diseases, and a new vision. What Dr. Kessler has delivered, however, is very different. Instead of faster drug approval, AIDS patients got a lethal 14-month delay in reviewing AZT/ddC combination therapy. There were more stalls on cancer drugs and a stubborn impasse on THA for Alzheimer's patients. Instead of new vision, the FDA returned to the consumer protectionism of the 1970s. Instead of judicious reforms, Dr. Kessler gave us headline grabbing seizures of orange juice and spaghetti sauce. The enforcement of FDA regulations for underground drugs for AIDS and Alzheimer's was shockingly discriminatory. Let's take a closer look: -- AIDS. In December 1990, the San Francisco Consortium of AIDS Physicians and the American Foundation for AIDS Research (AMFAR) petitioned the new FDA commissioner. Their petition asked for immediate review of two promising AIDS treatments, ddI and AZT/ddC combination therapy, and an approval decision by March 1, 1991. As a sop to AIDS activists who supported Dr. Kessler, ddI was approved in October 1991, after a six-month delay. AZT/ddC combination therapy was recommenced for approval early in April by the FDA Advisory Board, but actual approval languishes like a desert mirage in the distance. The superior efficacy of AZT/ddC combination therapy was evident at the time of the petition. It promises a major AIDS treatment advance over AZT: up to three years' added survival, compared with only one year's added survival with AZT alone. Those additional years could enable thousands to live long enough to benefit from the next generation of treatments. AZT/ddC should have been approved when the San Francisco Consortium and AMFAR asked. It is now one year later. The person who had the undeniable authority to avert that deadly and shameful year of delay was Commissioner Kessler. -- Cancer. As bad as Dr. Kessler's record is on AIDS, it's worse on cancer. Last summer he cracked down on promotion of cancer drugs for uses outside their labeled indications. This was a very harmful decision. More than half of all current cancer treatments involve off-label usage. Doctors depend on pharmaceutical companies to educate them about off-label usage. Without such continuing medical education paid for by the drug industry, doctors fall behind the state of the art. These considerations were lost on Dr. Kessler, for whom the bottom line is a headline, and the fastest route to the front page is an enforcement campaign. Who demanded Dr. Kessler's new enforcement campaign? Not cancer patients -- they are alarmed about it. The crackdown on off-label usage makes cancer doctors afraid to prescribe combinations of drugs that patients desperately need. Insurance companies are now refusing to reimburse. Regulating off-label usage was not the administration's idea. To the contrary, Vice President Dan Quayle's Council on Competitiveness opposes it as more regulation for regulation's sake. Not even Congress has the stomach for dumping new regulatory burdens on cancer patients. The demand to regulate off-label usage came from the FDA's bureaucratic empire builders who found an eager champion in Dr. Kessler. -- Alzheimer's Disease. Clinical trials in the U. S., Sweden and Britain show that the drug THA improves about one-third of the Alzheimer patients who suffer this otherwise untreatable affliction. THA also alleviates the suffering of their families. This wasn't good enough for Dr. Kessler. He chose instead to "protect" any patients who might experience minor, reversible liver malfunctions with THA. By keeping THA on import alert, Dr. Kessler is driving patients' families into the crime of smuggling. If George Bush wants credibility with AIDS and cancer patients and the families of Alzheimer's victims; if he wants business to believe his promise to cut regulatory burdens; if he expects the electorate to trust him with our health-care crisis, then he needs to acknowledge a mistake: his appointment of Dr. Kessler. Mr. Bush should then appoint a commissioner truly committed to rapid drug approval and with the courage to overhaul the FDA. William Summers, M. D. Alzheimer's Rights Alliance James Driscoll, Ph.D. Vice President Direct Action for Treatment Access Beverly Zakarian President Cancer Patients Action Alliance Arcadia, Calif. [This article is made available here by Dow Jones Co. for the personal and non-commercial use of callers to this bbs, in the hope that it will be of some help to those who are suffering from the disease and others who are seeking to help them.]