Subject: (Editorial): "They Know They Are Losing" Date: Published: 12/13/91 (75 lines) Source: Wall Street Journal. Copyright Dow Jones & Co. Inc. REVIEW & OUTLOOK (Editorial): `They Know They Are Losing' The modern public official has developed a variety of reactions to the seemingly unending onslaught of politically motivated attacks -- from throwing in the towel to hiring a good defense lawyer. Vice President Dan Quayle may have come up with the best response yet: Thank your critics for recognizing an effective opponent when they see one. Liberal Congressman Gerry Sikorski (D., Minn.) says, "Dan Quayle has made the transition from irrelevant to dangerous." What this means is that the Vice President is getting somewhere with his Council on Competitiveness, which is famous for its proposals to reform the legal system. Mr. Quayle and his group, operating within the structure of the White House, are now catching a lot of grief from liberals in Congress and elsewhere. Mr. Quayle responded to these attacks in a speech that he gave Tuesday to the Food and Drug Law Institute. He recalled the howling that greeted a proposed restructuring of the Food and Drug Administration to speed approval of drugs for AIDS and other serious diseases. "The very day we made our announcement, three Democratic committee chairmen tried to slow us down," Mr. Quayle said. "Quoting unnamed, so-called `respected experts,' they claim our reforms will `weaken' the FDA.... What I really want to know is, when they say `respected experts,' who are they talking about? Consumer activist groups? Trial lawyers?" It's clear that Mr. Quayle knew whom he was taking on: "Challenging the bureaucratic establishment is not the way you become popular in our nation's capital. You're going to irritate all three edges of what I call the iron triangle: the bureaucracy, the staff on Capitol Hill and those with a vested interest in the status quo." Mr. Quayle said that "when you don't do things their way, they shift immediately into attack mode." And they don't attack on the merits of legal reform or rationalizing wetlands rules or cutting red tape in biotechnology and telecommunications. That'd require some effort at serious thought. Instead, they fire the "ethics" weapon. The latest of many attempts to make policy differences with the White House into a crime (a tactic that helps attract press coverage) is their smear of Allan Hubbard, the executive director of the Competitiveness Council. Mr. Hubbard, an Indiana businessman before he came to Washington, gets dividends from an auto-wax company, and this is supposed to have ominous implications for his role in pollution regulation. And as Rep. John Conyers wrote us after our first editorial on this grand crusade, Mr. Hubbard "also reported receiving interest income from the bonds of 16 corporations and from the commercial paper of two corporations." We get the message: Unless you've worked for Common Cause all your life, don't risk government service. The Vice President understands well enough what is going on here. "Let's be very clear," Mr. Quayle said. "The attacks on the Competitiveness Council are nothing more than attempts by our critics to divert attention from an argument they know they are losing." Americans have caught on that the leviathan regulatory state built over the past 50 years now spends much of its time and money protecting itself. The Federal Regulatory Class has foisted too many rules onto the private sector and strapped local governments with little or no thought to costs. The "iron triangle," first identified by Ronald Reagan in his farewell address in December 1988 on domestic policy, is now doing its best to close off the Vice President's initiatives. So far, Mr. Quayle isn't bending. [This article is made available here by Dow Jones Co. for the personal and non-commercial use of callers to this bbs, in the hope that it will be of some help to those who are suffering from the disease and others who are seeking to help them.]