Subject: Television: The Magic Circus Date: Published: 11/18/91 (114 lines) Source: Wall Street Journal. Copyright Dow Jones & Co. Inc. LEISURE & ARTS: Television: The Magic Circus ---- By Dorothy Rabinowitz Though it's well over a week since the news broke that Magic Johnson is infected with the AIDS virus, the media orgy of commentary, tributes, lamentations and general frenzy is only now showing signs of letting up. Throughout this reportorial delirium we have been confidently and incessantly assured that Johnson's announcement will educate or shock complacent heterosexuals, and otherwise drive home lessons of profound importance to the health and welfare of the society. It's hard to remember any event, particularly any sad one, more freighted with hogwash and fevered claims about its benefits to society. Had anyone told us 25 years ago that the future would bring an invariably fatal venereal disease, and that persons, particularly famous persons, stricken by this disease would be celebrated as heroes, what would we have said? What would we have said, told that a beloved athlete's announcement that he has the virus would be enough to send his status zooming to stratospheric heights, and also bring forth tidal waves of media tributes to his valor? We would have laughed. No one is laughing now, in the midst of the breathless speculations and proclamations of a new day dawning for AIDS consciousness, thanks to Magic Johnson. A week at the center of these fevers was enough, not surprisingly, to unhinge Johnson himself; that became clear when he announced that, as long as anyone had to contract AIDS, he was glad it was him. He was glad, he went on to say, because he could be an effective spokesman for safe sex and because what happened to him could serve as a lesson to the young. This was the media message of the week. In fact, the real lesson likely to emerge from this entire event has little to do with Magic Johnson and the HIV virus. More of an exhibition than a lesson, really, this event showed -- not for the first time but with, in this case, extraordinary clarity -- the making of a media-created phenomenon. In the stupefying bombardment of nonstop piety, cant and wildly proliferating absurdities rocketing at us from television screens and front pages this past week, we saw unfolding before us a drama entirely manufactured by media hullabaloo. The actual dimensions of the event that had inspired all the rocketry -- word of the likely doom of a renowned young athlete -- disappeared into the mists. Broadcast journalists packing the nightly news with commentary and interviews did the same, while pretending that they were mere messengers transmitting the news. The truth was, of course, that the reporting that took up the better part of all newscasts for two days running -- the details of shock and grief that supposedly had paralyzed the nation, the young, the old, statesmen and all the ships at sea -- was largely the creation of the newsrooms. Reporters rushed to schools, neighborhood basketball courts, to solicit evidence of trauma. Anchormen hyperventilated as they told of the impact of Johnson's announcement, in terms suggesting that the nation had been left prostrate by grief. That's not to say that word of Johnson's infection didn't cause sorrow and shock; it is to take note of the media-orchestrated grief that occasions like this seem to breed. Over and over, the newscasts about Johnson flaunted synthetic emotions, expressions of shock produced on cue for reporters waiting to hear them. With the growing frequency of these media-made emotional benders, with grief counselors rushing into the schools in the advent of every misfortune, this may soon become a nation of people unable to tell when they are having a real emotion (as opposed to one visited on them or that they are expected to have). Can any sane person actually believe the picture of reality put forward by journalists -- that young people the nation over were shattered by sorrow over this news? Over and over the TV reporters put microphones up to the mouths of schoolchildren and extracted the answer they wanted, that they indeed had summoned. The invariable answer of these interviewees was that, yes, they were in shock, they were horrified. They then recited the week's official mantra, i.e., "If it could happen to Magic it can happen to me." Imagine, then, the impact of all this orchestrated grief on schoolchildren. The masters who once lorded it over Eastern Europe (and who still run North Korea) were aces at producing mass demonstrations of grief over some fallen state hero. But what the masters of the newsroom produced by way of orchestrated grief last week (though not inspired by totalitarian impulses) might have put Ceausescu himself to shame. No claim was too excessive to make for this event. Daniel Schorr told the National Public Radio audience that the country had not suffered such a shock since John Kennedy's assassination. Mr. Schorr was not alone in making this bizarre equation between Johnson's illness and the murder of a president. Nor was he unusual in believing what he said. In a classic case of self-induced hypnosis, the network powers-that-be appear to have bought their own story about the titanic impact Magic Johnson's illness will have on AIDS education and sexual behavior. Not coincidentally, the Fox Network a few days ago announced it would accept ads for condoms. Not wishing to hang back at this historic moment, CBS is now "reconsidering" its ban on condom ads; NBC is also rethinking its ban. ABC alone, as of now, anyway, is standing firm against condom ads. Undoubtedly there were, somewhere, some journalists, television journalists included, who recognized the Magic Johnson media circus for what it was: a private tragedy inflated beyond measure, whose human face now lies buried -- like that of many another anointed great symbol -- in humbug. [This article is made available here by Dow Jones Co. for the personal and non-commercial use of callers to this bbs, in the hope that it will be of some help to those who are suffering from the disease and others who are seeking to help them.]