Subject: Promising Results in Research on AIDS Based on False Assumption, Briton Says Date: Published: 10/3/91 (81 lines) Source: Wall Street Journal. Copyright Dow Jones & Co. Inc. Technology & Medicine: Promising Results in Research on AIDS Based on False Assumption, Briton Says ---- By Laurence Hooper Staff Reporter of The Wall Street Journal LONDON -- In a possible blow to efforts to develop an AIDS vaccine, a British researcher said some encouraging experimental results were based on a false assumption. James Stott, a senior scientist in an AIDS research program sponsored by the British government, said he had found that laboratory monkeys that appeared to develop immunity to a simian version of the acquired immune deficiency syndrome hadn't actually responded to a trial vaccine, as had been assumed. Instead, the monkeys reacted to the human cells used to make the vaccine, he asserted. Rather than producing antibodies to the AIDS-like disease, Dr. Stott said, the monkeys had produced antibodies to the foreign human cells. The confusion arose because the antibodies that were developed against the human cells also reacted against the simian virus. The implication, right or wrong, that the monkeys could produce antibodies against an AIDS-like virus without being infected by the virus throws a cloud over many AIDS vaccine experiments in monkeys. Many laboratories will now have to recheck their experiments to make sure such a mistake hadn't been made. In some instances, experiments may have to be redone at considerable cost. Monkeys are far more expensive than rats and mice to maintain in the laboratory. In a vaccine experiment it may take many monkeys and two to three years or even longer to determine whether an experimental vaccine is effective in protecting monkeys against the simian version of AIDS. Other areas of AIDS-vaccine research, especially those using vaccines produced in different ways, probably aren't affected by Dr. Stott's discovery. Several AIDS researchers said the importance of the false assumption couldn't be gauged until it was known how many people had made it. And they said a single report, even from a credible source such as Dr. Stott, shouldn't lead to pessimism about AIDS research. The report appears in today's issue of Nature, a British scientific journal. In an interview, Dr. Stott defended the continuing importance of his experiments, and noted that his monkey vaccine might still work if it were produced in a different way -- and might even be working to some extent already. But he conceded that he hadn't yet completed testing either of those theories. At a minimum, Dr. Stott's discovery throws a shadow over work under way in at least 15 research centers in Europe and the U. S., where scientists have been infecting monkeys with simian immunodeficiency virus, or SIV, which is similar to the virus that causes AIDS in human beings. The monkeys usually are inoculated with trial vaccines that, until now, had been thought to work because they contained "dead," or inactivated, SIV -- a common way to produce vaccines. Such a protection mechanism would suggest that a human vaccine in turn might be produced with dead HIV, the AIDS-causing human immunodeficiency virus. However, Dr. Stott's questionable experiment isn't the only problem troubling prospects for a human vaccine fashioned from dead virus. The risk that such a vaccine might accidentally contain some live HIV has long convinced many researchers that such an approach is far too dangerous to use for purposes of mass immunization. Dr. Stott conceded that his discovery was a setback for AIDS research. But he said he hoped "it may turn out to be a step back to a position from which we can see things differently, and hopefully more clearly." --- Jerry E. Bishop in New York contributed to this article. [This article is made available here by Dow Jones Co. for the personal and non-commercial use of callers to this bbs, in the hope that it will be of some help to those who are suffering from the disease and others who are seeking to help them.]