Subject: A Summary and Forecast Of Tax Developments Date: Published: 9/18/91 (117 lines) Source: Wall Street Journal. Copyright Dow Jones & Co. Inc. Tax Report: A Special Summary and Forecast Of Federal and State Tax Developments ---- By Scott R. Schmedel EVERY LITTLE BIT HELPS: Exemptions and deductions rise for 1992. With August inflation figures out, certain tax benefits may be indexed for 1992, says Prof. James Young of Grand Valley State University, Grand Rapids, Mich. His unofficial calculations show the personal exemption rising to $2,300 from 1991's $2,150. Standard deductions will rise by $200 for a single person, $300 on a joint return, and $250 for a head of household, he says. Also to rise are the thresholds for rate brackets and for phasing out exemptions and itemized deductions for upper-income taxpayers. On a joint return, taxable 1992 income faces a 28% rate after reaching $35,800 and a 31% rate after $86,500; this year, those thresholds are $34,000 and $82,150. A couple will begin to lose the benefit of exemptions when their 1992 adjusted gross income exceeds $157,900, up from $150,000 in 1991, Young figures. For a single person, the threshold for exemption phase-out will rise to $105,250 from $100,000, he says. Generally, itemized deductions will be trimmed after 1992 adjusted gross income hits $105,250, up from $100,000. CORPORATE LOSSES on selling subsidiaries' stock aren't deductible. So say final rules on an issue that has had companies grumbling for 18 months. "The Treasury essentially rejected all proposals to ameliorate the harshness" of its prior drafts, says Gilbert Bloom of KPMG Peat Marwick, CPAs. To block abusive schemes to avoid tax on asset dispositions, the rules (T. D. 8364) deny deduction of a loss on a disposition of stock in a unit with which the seller files a consolidated return. The rules are effective as of last Feb. 1. Companies claim the rules are over-simplified and arbitrarily deny deductions of real economic losses. A 50-page preamble rejecting taxpayers' suggested revisions isn't convincing, Lawrence Axelrod of Deloitte & Touche, CPAs, protests. He predicts many companies will contest the new rules and that the issue ultimately will be decided in a "landmark" court case. MULTISTATE CONCERNS must act soon to ease effects of state tax increases. Pressed for cash, many states changed radically the way they tax business. Texas, despite its avowed scorn for income taxes, enacted what critics call a disguised corporate income tax. Businesses should analyze the new laws now, says Philip Tatarowicz of Ernst & Young, CPAs, for action is required in many states as early as Sept. 30. Texas also is suspending Oct. 1 its phase-in of a sales-tax exemption for manufacturing equipment, so companies must decide whether to accelerate purchase plans. Ohio enacted sweeping rules to remove incentives to use holding companies based in tax havens Delaware and Nevada to reduce Ohio taxes; other states are watching the results with interest. Certain concerns can minimize the effect with a limited credit, Tatarowicz says, but they must notify Ohio tax authorities by certified mail by Sept. 30 that they plan to take the credit. Pennsylvania concerns have until Oct. 3 to make catch-up tax payments to reflect retroactive rate increases and disallowances of loss carry-forwards. OIL, GAS, AND MINERAL developers have firm grounds for refunds of some alternative minimum taxes, Coopers & Lybrand says: Federal-circuit appeals judges upheld a controversial Claims Court ruling and let William F. Hill allow for costs of equipment such as oil rigs in figuring depletion allowances permitted by minimum-tax rules. CHECKING ON CHECKOFFS: Illinois filers will be able to contribute to eight causes on their 1991 state returns, up from three this year. The new funds are to help drug-abuse prevention, victims of AIDS or domestic violence, persons with disabilities, and Olympic athletes. FINE-TUNING efforts to collect over $1 billion in unpaid fines for driving and other offenses, California legislators passed a bill to enable the state to skim the cash off state tax refunds claimed by the delinquents. Gov. Wilson is expected to sign it soon. ESTATE-FREEZE RULES can tax trust beneficiaries unfairly, a lawyer says. The IRS plans a hearing Friday on proposed rules restricting efforts to cut estate and gift taxes by freezing values of interests in a family-owned business. An owner may try to accomplish a freeze by retaining fixed-value preferred stock and, before dying, giving appreciable common stock to children or grandchildren. But the proposed rules can create unfair taxes on trust transactions when there is no attempt to freeze an estate, Mark J. Silverman of the law firm Steptoe & Johnson in Washington, plans to testify. Wealthy families often place business interests in trust for tax and non-tax reasons; a trust may even set up a business with a beneficiary. The problem lies in the way the rules attribute the benefits of trust assets for tax purposes, Silverman says. The effect is that a beneficiary who isn't involved in a venture with a trust may be treated as having made a taxable gift to a younger family member who is involved in the venture or who is a trust beneficiary. The "involuntary gift" occurs even though the person doesn't control the trust and won't include it in his estate. BRIEFS: IRS Revenue Procedure 91-52 clarifies that a company's overpayment of taxes for one period won't be applied automatically to the next period's liability unless the taxpayer elects that treatment.... A House Ways and Means panel plans another hearing Sept. 25 on safeguards for taxpayers' rights. [This article is made available here by Dow Jones Co. for the personal and non-commercial use of callers to this bbs, in the hope that it will be of some help to those who are suffering from the disease and others who are seeking to help them.]