Subject: Editorial: Chromosome Cartography Date: Published: 3/16/89 (91 lines) Source: Wall Street Journal. Copyright Dow Jones & Co. Inc. REVIEW & OUTLOOK (Editorial): Chromosome Cartography Biotechnology today affords us the potential to offer humankind relief from the scourge of many diseases and infirmities. The techniques of gene identification, separation and splicing now allow us to discover the basic causes of ailments and, thus, to progress toward cures and even precursory treatments that might ward off the onset of illness ranging from cancer to heart disease and AIDS. What is lacking is a blueprint -- a map of the human genome. Without that blueprint, genetic engineers will make progress, but it's generally agreed that progress will come faster if they have before them a full genetic diagram. The United States is close to committing itself to the awesome task of creating that diagram. The National Academy of Sciences estimates that $3 billion will be required over the next 10 to 15 years to map the human genome. Last year, the federal government provided only $29 million to finance research into mapping the genome. The new Bush budget, however, calls for funding of about $100 million for what has come to be known as the Human Genome Initiative. The human genome is complex. The body contains approximately 10 trillion cells. Each cell contains 46 chromosomes, arranged in a double helix of 23 pairs resembling two, intertwined spiral staircases. Each chromosome contains a strand of DNA to encode the genes. On all the chromosomes, there are between 50,000 and 100,000 genes encoding information that controls human growth and accounts for everything from hair and eye color to some aspects of personality and proneness to certain diseases, such as cystic fibrosis. Among the chromosomes scheduled for initial exploration, for instance, is the 21st chromosome because it is believed to be linked to Alzheimer's disease and Down's syndrome. All the body's genes together make up the human genome. Microbiologists need to know the sequence of the estimated three billion DNA subunits; so far, only about 1,500 human genes have been identified. The project, of course, is not without risks. For starters, it remains to be seen whether Congress will forgo some of its treasured, redundant pork-barrel spending to support the enterprise. Ethicists are worrying that such knowledge will exacerbate prejudices against individuals with "non-normal" genes, such as the handicapped or some unborn infants. Surely an intelligent society should be able to cope with these issues while it pursues useful knowledge. David Baltimore, a renowned MIT biologist, raises a more practical concern: "Megaprojects are inviting targets for the political control of science." Dr. Baltimore is obviously correct. Indeed, the idea of mapping the human genome is already under political pressure in Europe. Germany, Britain, Italy and France all have individual genome programs planned or under way. But criticism of the idea centers on the plans of the European Commission, in Brussels, which wants to spend $17 million on coordination efforts, including liaison with the U. S. project. Some members of the European Parliament are already saying that the project isn't being sufficiently regulated, that there are all sorts of questions to answer concerning ethics and "misuse" that ought to be answered before it proceeds. This, of course, is a formula for making no progress at all. While the opposition in Europe may use regulatory overreach to achieve its goals, the weapon of choice in the U. S. has been the anti-biotech lawsuit and anti-science scare campaigns. This combination has slowed several significant biotech experiments and entangled federal officials in their own regulations. American scientists eventually are going to have to step up to this battle. Up to now, they have been content to stay in their labs, while in the world outside, science demagogues, press agents and Members of Congress have frightened enough people to create significant problems for scientific progress in the U. S. Witness the destructive opposition to experimentation in animal subjects. The Human Genome Initiative will be a strong test of the U. S. 's ability to shape and implement science policy. It may well invite attack from those who are fearful of or hostile to the future. It should also attract the active support of those willing to defend the future. [This article is made available here by Dow Jones Co. for the personal and non-commercial use of callers to this bbs, in the hope that it will be of some help to those who are suffering from the disease and others who are seeking to help them.]