Subject: multifactorial causitive models
Date: Thu, 08 Jun 1995 20:25:35 -0400 (EDT) (166 lines of text)
From: AIDS_CURE at delphi.com

  I want to clarify my position as to the true causative
factors of AIDS.  The only problem we have is my inability
to accurately articulate my observations and findings. I
agree the simplified picture I put on the front of my
book(identifying volatile atmospheric hydrocarbons "toxins")
as the causative agent is misleading. I meant to implicate
them as one of several cofactors(including drugs, alcohol,
smoking, malnutrition, lack of exposure to ultra violet
light, and a stressful lifestyle).

 I am living proof that HIV does not cause Aids. I agree the
so called "HIV" plays no role in the disease process. I
believe the only thing the ELISA Test can determine is that
your body is producing antibodies. I believe that an HIV
Positive test may indicate that an unhealthy nutritional
deficiency is developing, ie. an accumulation of internal
toxins is present that the body has not been able to
breakdown due to these deficiencies. The presence of these
toxins causes the body to produce antibodies.

 I say my development of Aids was due to a multifactor
causitive concept. For two years: I drank 3-4 beers per
day(drug use), I was malnourished (lived on coffee & small
portions of junk food), I had a high stress job and personal
life so I got very little sleep. All these are the primary
contributing risk factors.

  But the final determining factor that caused me to develop
into the Aids conditions(instead of an unhealthy alcoholic)
was that I was also exposed to high levels of TOXIC FUMES,
primarily containing acetaldehyde and formaldehyde. At the
cellular level, my body had built-up an accumulation of
metabolic toxins(acetylaldehyde, etc) due to the alcohol and
malnutrition. The toxins from the fumes just pushed my body
"over the top" into the chemical imbalance conditions of
Aids.  People I worked with were also exposed to the toxic
fumes, but since they ate three nutritious meals and had
less risk factors in there life they were not noticeably
affected by these toxins.

  The toxic chemical compounds contain the elements carbon
and hydrogen and bond together with a chemical energy so
high that the antibodies that the body is producing can not
separate the compounds into their elemental components and
thus detoxify them to the body. This may also be due to the
antibodies being deficient in NAD, a coenzyme that is
essential for the normal cell to function. The bodies
cellular immunity is dependant upon this niacin containing
enzyme being present in each cell.

 The mechanism by which drug use and other risk factors
become debilitating is they deplete the niacin containing
coenzymes, NAD and NADP, and create a massive deficiency of
niacin and other vitamins. By restoring the bodies normal
chemical balance to each cell with high levels of Niacin, B-
Complex, Vitanin C and other nutritional supplements the
toxins are eliminated naturally from the body.

 The appearance of so called multinucleated cells, is in
reality due to cells that are deficient of NAD & NADP and
which have accumulated a mass of molecular toxins within the
cell wall. The so called "HIV mass" is only one of several
symptoms that develop with this accumulation of toxins in
the human body. Over a period of prolonged risk factors
these molecular toxins may mass together by an anerobic
chemical attraction and form the masses that have formerly
been reffered to as HIV.  This is why Peter Duesberg has
found over 4,000 documented cases of Aids without the
presence of HIV. By accumulating these high toxin levels
over a shorter period of time, the Aids conditions develop
before the toxic compounds have time to form into masses.

 There is no pathogenic organism that invades the body and
replicates itself to suddently appear as a mass of chemical
compounds that can be seen with the electron
microscope(formerly referred to as HIV). You do not get Aids
from having sex, sharing needles or from blood transfusions.
You develop these conditions over a period of several years
through a process Peter Duesberg refers to as a Risk-Aids
Hypothesis.

 I am in complete agreement with Professor Duesburg, Paul
Philpott, and others who contend that the primary cause of
the "Aids Condition" is Drug use and malnutrition. But that
explaination alone does not account for why some people who
do drugs and are malnurished develop the Aids symptoms and
some escape them. All I have done is identify other risk
factors (independant variables) that can contribute to the
development of the Aids and Aids Related Complex conditions.

  I believe we should have a scientific model or models that
effectively communicate the message that we are trying to
convey that HIV does not cause Aids. What we need to present
is a defensable positive statement of what does cause Aids.
Keeping in mind that this is a work in progress I offer a
rough draft of these multifactorial causitive relationships.
      AIDS RISK FACTORS: Drug use + malnutrition + lifestyle
= AIDS Drug use + Alcohol + malnutrition = AIDS Drug use +
Malnutrition + atmospheric toxins = AIDS Alcohol +
Malnutrition + atmospheric toxins = AIDS Alcohol + Smoking +
Malnutrition + atmospheric toxins = AIDS Alcohol +
Malnutrition + atmospheric toxins + stress = AIDS Drug use +
Alcohol + Smoking + Malnutrition + Atmospheric Toxins = AIDS
Mothers toxin level + Malnutrition + Atmospheric Toxins =
Pediatric AIDS

Where: Drug use is a product of the type of drug and the
time factor; Alcohol is a product of amount and the time
factor; Malnutrition is a product of extent and time;
Smoking is a product of the toxin level and time;
Atmospheric toxins is a product of level and time; and
stress is a product of the several additive effects which
are commonly identifiable; and lifestyle is a product of
several additive factors including sexual activity.

 These models would appear much more scientific if I had the
capability of providing subscript notations instead of my
lengthy explainations. I will gladly accept the opinions
recently posted as to which drugs pose the greatest risk
factors and which should be weighted as much less of a risk.
I would appreciate it if someone could summarize these
discussions into a simplified listing of drugs and their
rank as probable risk.

 AIDS is a condition where there is an accumulation of
internalized toxins(from several possible sources) with the
accoumpaning malnutrition and nutritional deficiencies.
Restoreing the bodies natural biochemistry with theraputic
levels of Nutritional supplements allows the bodies natural
immune system to break down these toxins and restores the
individual to health.

 All of the causitive risk models contain the malnutrition
factor. Thus with the appropriate Nutritional therapies all
AIDS conditions are completely preventable, if identified
early enough in their development.  Fully developed AIDS
conditions are treatable, reverseable and potentially
cureable with the appropriate Nutritional Therapies.

 I am strenuously opposed to classifing these treatments as
"Alternative Treatments". In many peoples mind this title
puts them in the group with acupuncture, meditation, massage
and other alternatives, which have been summarily dismissed
as being unscientific and worthless. By even using the term
Alternative we are admitting that anti-viral agents(toxins)
are the preferred treatment. By simply stating that we
advocate Nutritional Therapies we are saying this is the
"Preferred Treatment Protocol". This opens the discussion
into what do Nutritional Therapies involve and what is the
scientific basis for these procedures.

 We now have available sufficient scientific research and
documentation to prove that these Nutritional Therapies have
proven to be more beneficial than any other treatment
protocol in the world. If you question this fact get the
book, Nutrition and AIDS, edited by Ronald R. Watson. The
book is published by CRC Press of Boca Raton, Florida and
costs about $100 American.  The CRC number is 800-272-7737
or you can read my summary on the back of my free brochure.

 I hope this statement clarifies any misconceptions I might
have engendered with my previous brief and inept postings.
No worries mates we're on the same team. Thanks for your
input.

Bill Lamb